THE PUBLIC PERFORMANCE OF SANCTIONS IN INSOLVENCY CASES: THE DARK, HUMILIATING, AND RIDICULOUS SIDE OF THE LAW OF DEBT IN THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE. A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF SHAMING PRACTICES

Authors: Alessandra Pera

ABSTRACT

This study provides a diachronic comparative overview of how the law of debt has been applied by certain institutions in Italy. Specifically, it offers historical and comparative insights into the public performance of sanctions for insolvency through shaming and customary practices in Roman Imperial Law, in the Middle Ages, and in later periods.
The first part of the essay focuses on the Roman bonorum cessio culo nudo super lapidem and on the medieval customary institution called pietra della vergogna (stone of shame), which originates from the Roman model.
The second part of the essay analyzes the social function of the zecca and the pittima Veneziana during the Republic of Venice, and of the practice of lu soldate a castighe (no translation is possible).
The author uses a functionalist approach to apply some arguments and concepts from the current context to this historical analysis of ancient institutions that we would now consider ridiculous.
The article shows that the customary norms that play a crucial regulatory role in online interactions today can also be applied to the public square in the past. One of these tools is shaming. As is the case in contemporary online settings, in the public square in historic periods, shaming practices were used to enforce the rules of civility in a given community. Such practices can be seen as virtuous when they are intended for use as a tool to pursue positive change in forces entrenched in the culture, and thus to address social wrongs considered outside the reach of the law, or to address human rights abuses.

Keywords: Public Shaming - Diachronic Comparative Method - Pietra Della Vergogna – Pittima -Zecca - Functionalism

FULL TEXT: